Indicators Project Home
The Boston Foundation
The Boston Indicators Project
Hub of Innovation
Civic Agenda
Data Portal
Whats next?
Links and Resources
Contact Us
spacer


Civic HealthCultural Life and the ArtsEconomyEducationEnvironmentHousingPublic HealthPublic SafetyTechnologyTransportation  
Public Safety
PUBLIC SAFETY OVERVIEW
Highlights HIGHLIGHTS
Innovations INNOVATIONS
Civic Agenda CIVIC AGENDA
Research RESEARCH
Links and Resources LINKS & RESOURCES
PUBLIC SAFETY INDICATORS
At-A-Glance AT-A-GLANCE
8.1 Balanced, Robust Strategies for Public Safety, Regional and Homeland Security
8.2 Low Crime Rates in Boston
8.3 Perception of Public Safety
8.4 Strong Civic and Social Networks
8.5 Supportive Environment for Youth and Children
8.6 Partnerships for Violence Reduction
8.7 Police and Community Relations
8.8 Public Funding and Support
Error: 13
Description: Type mismatch
Source: Microsoft VBScript runtime error

Public Safety: Goals & Measures

Goals
Indicator Measures
How are we doing?
iconGoal

8.1 Balanced, Robust Strategies for Public Safety, Regional and Homeland Security

iconIndicator

8.1.1 Impact of Homeland Security on local public safety resources

Federal Homeland Security resources through the state were made available to Boston and eight surrounding cities in 2004, totaling $60 million in FY 2004 and 2005 – still requiring the diversion of local funds.
iconIndicator

8.1.2 Collaboration for preventive strategies and emergency preparedness

The Metropolitan Mayors Coalition – ten cities coordinated by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (Boston, Cambridge, Chelsea, Everett, Malden, Medford, Quincy, Revere and Somerville) – works with UMass's Center for Emergency Preparedness. The Boston Mayor's Office of Homeland Security coordinates plans with both City departmernts and neighboring cities and towns. 
iconIndicator

8.1.3 Trends in local public safety in Metro Boston vs. other metro regions and Boston vs. other large cities

The Boston Metro Area (CMSA) ranked 10th lowest for violent crimes per capita among the 50 largest metro areas in the US in 2004, an improvement from its ranking of 15th in 2002. Violent crime in Boston increased by 3% between 2002 and 2004 compared to an average 3% decrease nationally and in the Northeast.


iconGoal

8.2 Low Crime Rates in Boston

iconIndicator

8.2.1 Trends in reported citywide crime in Part One (Serious) Crime, Part Two (Quality of Life) Crimes and for Crimes in Public Housing

Reported violent crime in Boston increased by 3% between 2002 and 2003, while property and quality of life crimes decreased by 3%. Between 1993 and 2003, violent crime in Boston declined by 38%.
iconIndicator

8.2.2 Trends in reported Part One Crime per/1000 population by Boston neighborhood

Reported violent crime decreased or held steady in all but five Boston neighborhoods, and is as much as six times higher in some neighborhoods than in others.


iconGoal

8.3 Perception of Public Safety

iconIndicator

8.3.1 Resident public perception of safety and quality of life ranking by Boston neighborhood

Survey results show a slight loss in neighborhood quality perceptions, with Boston overall holding steady, while 74% of Bostonians report feeling somewhat or very safe – from a high of 90% in West Roxbury to a low of 54% in Roxbury. 
iconIndicator

8.3.2 Public perception of threats to community

The BPS 2003 biennial survey reports that Bostonians identified litter and trash, car break-ins, kids hanging  around, drug sales, and vandalism as their top five concerns, with car theft declining as a concern.  


iconGoal

8.4 Strong Civic and Social Networks

iconIndicator

8.4.1 Residents who trust their neighbors, by neighborhood

About 80% of Bostonians feel they can rely on neighbors for help – from a high in West Roxbury at 92% to a low of  73% in Roxbury and East Boston, with dramatic improvement in Fenway/Kenmore, from 57% in 1997 to 84% in 2003.
iconIndicator

8.4.2 Domestic violence by neighborhood

BPS reported incidents declined to the lowest levels since 1993, but health and service providers report an increase. Mattapan has the highest reported rate.
iconIndicator

8.4.3 Trends in reported citywide hate crimes

From 1993 to 2003, hate crimes have fluctuated between 240 and 340, with a continuing post 9/11 spike against specific groups. 


iconGoal

8.5 Supportive Environment for Youth and Children

iconIndicator

8.5.1 Juvenile crime rates by gender

Juvenile arrests (under 16 years of age) declined by 23% between 1993 and 2001 but rose by 9% between 2001 and 2003.  The number of arrests for violent  crime increased by 16% between 1993 and 2001 and by 19% between 2001 and 2003, offset by a steep decline (39% between 1993 and 2001) in “quality of life” crimes.
iconIndicator

8.5.2 After school programs for boys and girls vs. need

The Boston After-School for All Partnership, established in 2001, is the largest public-private partnership focused on children in Boston’s history, raising $24 million from 14 partners to expand the availability and quality of Boston’s after-school programs.  By 2003, it had created an additional 4,300 new spaces in after-school programs, with 84 of the City’s 106 elementary and middle schools offering programs – up from 69 in 2001. Formalizing this function, a new organization, After-School and Beyond, continues to expand to meet the demands of Boston’s more than 80,000 school-aged children, about 60,000 of whom are in public schools.  Older youth are the least well served. 
iconIndicator

8.5.3 School suspension and expulsion rates at Boston Public Schools by level

Boston’s school drop out rate has improved.  The current 21.1% drop out rate is the lowest in 20 years.  However, one in five Boston Public School students is not graduating within five years after entering high school, and some experts believe that the rate would be higher if calculated differently.  The Boston Private Industry Council is leading efforts, with the BPS, to reduce drop rates.


iconGoal

8.6 Partnerships for Violence Reduction

iconIndicator

8.6.1 Partnerships with law enforcement agencies by type and by neighborhood

Between 1994 and 2002, the BPD developed 963 partnerships across a broad range of organizations, from community- and faith-based groups to academic, business and intergovernmental collaborations.  Now, of all neighborhoods of the city, partnerships are deepest in the South End, Roxbury and Dorchester.  A new Boston initiative, B-Smart, is designed to broaden and deepen collaboration across the city.


iconGoal

8.7 Police and Community Relations

iconIndicator

8.7.1 Respect and trust between residents and Boston police officers

In 2003, 67% of Bostonians felt that Boston police officers performed a good or excellent job in being fair and respectful, according to the biennial BPD Survey, down slightly from 2001. Confidence in the BPD’s ability to prevent crime declined slightly, from 87% in 2001 to 82%, compared to 60% in 1995. However, responses vary widely by neighborhood.



iconGoal

8.8 Public Funding and Support

iconIndicator

8.8.1 Trends in federal, state and city funding for public safety

Data and analysis to come.