Indicators Project Home
The Boston Foundation
The Boston Indicators Project
Hub of Innovation
Civic Agenda
Data Portal
Whats next?
Links and Resources
Contact Us
spacer


Civic HealthCultural Life and the ArtsEconomyEducationEnvironmentHousingPublic HealthPublic SafetyTechnologyTransportation  
Civic Agenda
CIVIC HEALTH OVERVIEW
Highlights HIGHLIGHTS
Innovations INNOVATIONS
Civic Agenda CIVIC AGENDA
Research RESEARCH
Links and Resources LINKS & RESOURCES
CIVIC HEALTH INDICATORS
At-A-Glance AT-A-GLANCE
1.1 Metro Boston’s Competitive Edge in Civic Health
1.2 High Rates of Social Capital
1.3 Representative Leadership
1.4 High Rates of Voter Participation
1.5 Healthy Race and Community Relations
1.6 Stability and Investment in Neighborhoods
1.7 A Welcoming and Inclusive Environment
1.8 Access to Information
1.9 Strength of the Nonprofit Sector
1.10 Public Support and Philanthropy
Error: 13
Description: Type mismatch
Source: Microsoft VBScript runtime error
Civic Health: Goals & Measures

Goals
Indicator Measures
How are we doing?
iconGoal

1.1 Metro Boston’s Competitive Edge in Civic Health

iconIndicator

1.1.1 Racial and ethnic diversity

In 2000, more than half of the total population of the City of Boston consisted of African Americans, Latinos and Asian Americans, and more than one-quarter were foreign born. About 337,000 newcomer immigrants arrived in MA in the 1990s, accounting for 82% of the net growth in the labor force.
iconIndicator

1.1.2 Massachusetts ranking on the United Way State of Caring Index

The Bay State ranked 6th, up from 21st place in 1992.
iconIndicator

1.1.3 Opportunities for civic discourse in Boston

Greater Boston offers an unusually large number of opportunities for civic discourse, but language isolation can pose obstacles to participation.  About 33% of Boston residents speak a language other than English at home.


iconGoal

1.2 High Rates of Social Capital

iconIndicator

1.2.1. Boston residents’ trust in neighbors

Rates of neighborly trust vary across Boston neighborhoods. In 2003, West Roxbury residents surveyed had the highest rate of neighborly trust while Allston-Brighton, Roxbury and East Boston had the lowest.
iconIndicator

1.2.2 Civic engagement and social and racial trust, Boston compared to other cities

Bostonians score high on “diversity of friendships” and “political and civic engagement” but lower on “social trust,” with people of color expressing lower levels of social trust than whites, and Boston scoring behind Seattle and Denver overall.
iconIndicator

1.2.3 Volunteer activity in Boston

Volunteerism in Boston is growing.  For example, Boston Cares has more than 6,000 active members – 75% of them new in the past two years and 70% of whom live in Boston – and the number of projects undertaken has increased from 30 in 1992 to more than 1,000 today.


iconGoal

1.3 Representative Leadership

iconIndicator

1.3.1. Leadership of Metro Boston’s top 100 companies, by race and gender

Among the 100 largest corporations in Greater Boston, more than 95% of board members are white and more than 90% are male, while statewide, women fill only 9.2 of the executive officer positions of the state’s largest companies, with more than a quarter of the companies having no women at either the board or executive level.
iconIndicator

1.3.2. Diversity of elected leadership, Massachusetts Legislature and the Boston City Council, by race and gender

Following the 2004 election, the 200-member state legislature includes a total of 56 women legislators in the House and the Senate.  The Boston City Council includes two female councilors, or about 15%, three councilors of color, or about 23%, and almost half of the members are under 40.


iconGoal

1.4 High Rates of Voter Participation

iconIndicator

1.4.1. Registered voters and participation rates, Boston

Between 2000 and 2004, voter turnout in Boston increased by 9% overall, with double-digit gains in wards with large numbers of voters of color such as Chinatown, Uphams Corner, Grove Hall, Dudley, and Mission Hill; however, voter turnout remains highest in Boston’s traditional high-voting wards, which are predominantly white.
iconIndicator

1.4.2. Number of contested elections in Massachusetts

The number of contested legislative seats in the Massachusetts declined from 75% in 1990 to 29% in 2000.  In the 2004 election, the Republican Governor made a major effort to recruit candidates for seats held by incumbent Democrats.  As a result, the number of contested legislative elections increased to just over 50%.


iconGoal

1.5 Healthy Race and Community Relations

iconIndicator

1.5.1. Reported hate crimes by type

The number of hate crimes in Boston investigated by the Community Disorders Unit of the Boston Police Department fluctuated between 224 and 343 per year from 1993 to 2003. The greatest number of hate crimes – one quarter to one-third – are perpetrated against African Americans and those singled out on the basis of sexual orientation.
iconIndicator

1.5.2. Degree of residential segregation in Boston and Metro Boston

Residential segregation declined somewhat in the Boston region between 1990 and 2000. Whites living in the suburbs are the most isolated group: on average, they live on blocks that are more than 90% white, while whites in cities live on blocks that are 70% white.  In Boston, African Americans reside on blocks that are, on average, 60% African American.



iconGoal

1.6 Stability and Investment in Neighborhoods

iconIndicator

1.6.1. People living at the same address by number of years and by neighborhood

Residential turnover among homeowners is a characteristic of Boston’s more affluent neighborhoods such as Back Bay and Beacon Hill, particularly among renters, while longer-tenured households are characteristic of Boston’s family neighborhoods.

iconIndicator

1.6.2. Small business loans by neighborhood

Data and analysis to come.


iconGoal

1.7 A Welcoming and Inclusive Environment

iconIndicator

1.7.1 Public buildings and amenities accessible to people with disabilities

In 2004, the Massachusetts Office on Disability surveyed the state’s 351 municipalities to determine whether all of the polling locations in the state were accessible and found that all polling places were accessible in only 19%, with accessible venues overall representing only about 40% of the total.
iconIndicator

1.7.2. Multi-lingual capacity in major public institutions in Boston

The Mayor’s Office of New Bostonians makes interpreters available from the staff of this City department, with translation available in 24 languages.


iconGoal

1.8 Access to Information

iconIndicator

1.8.1 Library books in circulation, by Boston neighborhood

Following a dramatic 25% decline in circulation between 1998 and 1999, circulation at the Boston Public Library was up 5% and up 10% between 1999 and 2000 at the branch libraries, but has not risen since.

iconIndicator

1.8.2 Community newspapers by neighborhood and linguistic group

Boston is one of the few major cities in the US with two competing daily newspapers and a wealth of community and ethnically-focused newspapers.


iconGoal

1.9 Strength of the Nonprofit Sector

iconIndicator

1.9.1 Nonprofits by budget and type in Boston

In Massachusetts, there were about 10,000 nonprofit organizations in 2004, 44% of which had an annual budget of less than $100,000.
iconIndicator

1.9.2 Revenues for Boston’s 20 largest nonprofit organizations

Between 2002 and 2004, more than half of the largest nonprofit organizations saw a decline in revenues in the range of 5% - 10%.  However, the revenues of the Museum of Science declined by 40% and those of the New England Aquarium by 63%.


iconGoal

1.10 Public Support and Philanthropy

iconIndicator

1.10.1 In- and out-of-state grants in Metro Boston

Foundations gave about $513 million to Metro Boston organizations in 2002, up 13% from 2000, according to 2004 analysis.
iconIndicator

1.10.2 Public support, all sources, Massachusetts compared to all states

Massachusetts ranked third in “Having” but only 39th in “Giving,” according to the Generosity Index.  However, according to the United Way of America, when all sources of support for nonprofit services are calculated, Massachusetts ranks first among all states.
iconIndicator

1.10.3 Assets and grants, Massachusetts’ top 50 foundations

There was a 2.7% increase in grants made by the 50 largest Massachusetts foundations between 2000 and 2002.  There was a 6% decline in the assets of the 50 largest Massachusetts foundations between 2000 and 2002, according to 2004 analysis.