Indicators Project Home
 
SummaryCivic HealthCultural Life & The ArtsEconomyEducationEnvironmentHousingPublic HealthPublic SafetyTechnologyTransportation
 
  Transportation : Goals & Measures
 
 

 

Goals
Indicator Measures
How are we doing?
ICON- Goal 10.1 Transportation that Enhances National and Global Competitiveness ICON - Indicator 10.1.1  Metro Boston’s global and national transportation capacity Boston’s air, sea and land connections contribute to its regional, national and local connectivity but are pressured by growth
ICON - Indicator 10.1.2  Household income spent on transportation: Boston vs. comparable regions In 1999-2000, transportation-related costs in Metro Boston accounted for 16.6% of total household expenditures

ICON- Goal 10.2 An Integrated Regional System ICON - Indicator 10.2.1  Distribution of daily trips, Boston and Metro Boston In 2002, despite a strong public transit system, about 77% of the 927,000 daily trips into Boston were by private cars
ICON - Indicator 10.2.2  Trends in rapid-transit ridership From 2000 to 2002, the subway system gained 20,000 new riders, who account for 668,000 new weekday trips. The T system is operating at 186.4% of its capacity at rush hours

ICON- Goal 10.3 Equitable and High Quality Transportation Access for All ICON - Indicator 10.3.1 Residents within a 10-minute walk or short drive from transit nodes by race, income, age group and transit dependencys 56% of Boston residents, 79% of jobs and 51% of public schools are within a 10-minute walk, but low-income residents are underserved by walk-to rapid transit access
ICON - Indicator 10.3.2 Convenience of service to bus riders In 2001 the bus system was operating at 103% of capacity.  Frequency of service was highest on routes through low-income communities followed by routes through communities of color
ICON - Indicator 10.3.3 Safety on streets and personal safety on public transit Massachusetts has only nine fatalities per 100,000 licensed drivers, less than half of the national average of 22.  Crime on MBTA was unchanged

ICON- Goal 10.4 Environmentally Sustainable Transportation ICON - Indicator 10.4.1 Car ownership and vehicle miles traveled, Boston and Metro Boston From 1990 to 2000, car ownership in Boston rose by 34% and by 26% in Metro Boston
  ICON - Indicator 10.4.2 Vehicular greenhouse gas emissions Between 1996 and 1998, CO2 emissions in the state declined from 21.9 to 17.6 million metric tons but transportation’s share rose from 7.83 to 8.45 million metric tons
  ICON - Indicator 10.4.3 Use of clean-fuel vehicles by the MBTA In 2001, the MBTA purchased 124 new clean-fuel buses, up from 19 buses in 2000

ICON- Goal 10.5 Options that Enhance Civic and Community Life ICON - Indicator 10.5.1 Miles of bike and pedestrian ways, people walking and biking to work Fewer people walked/biked to work in Boston/Inner Core/ Metro Boston, and car registrations increased from 1990 to 2000
  ICON - Indicator 10.5.2 Traffic and parking volume in Boston From 1977 to 1999, traffic volume grew dramatically on Boston roads that carry the bulk of through traffic
  ICON - Indicator 10.5.3 Hours spent stuck in traffic The average annual number of hours residents of Metro Boston spend stuck in traffic increased from 28 in 1990 to 42 in 2000

ICON- Goal 10.6 Adequate Public Funding ICON - Indicator 10.6.1 Transportation funding by mode Despite the ability of mass transit to ease congestion, and improve local connectivity and mobility, highway and air transport receive the lion’s share of public subsidies

 
 
Click for Printer Friendly Version of THIS PAGE
 
   


Send Feedback on the Project


©2003 The Boston Foundation