Indicators Project Home
 
SummaryCivic HealthCultural Life & The ArtsEconomyEducationEnvironmentHousingPublic HealthPublic SafetyTechnologyTransportation
 
  Civic Health : Goals & Measures
 
 
Goals
Indicator Measures
How are we doing?
ICON- Goal 1.1 Metro Boston’s Competitive Edge in Civic Health ICON - Indicator 1.1.1 Racial and ethnic diversity Boston is 25% foreign born for the first time since 1940, immigrants were responsible growth in the 1990s, and Boston is more than 50% of color
ICON - Indicator 1.1.2 Massachusetts ranking on the United Way Caring Index Massachusetts ranked third overall among all states on the United Way’s Caring Index, but 44nd in income inequality — a major factor in the index
ICON - Indicator 1.1.3 Opportunities for civic discourse in Boston Opportunities and participation are growing

ICON- Goal 1.2 High Rates of Social Capital ICON - Indicator 1.2.1 Boston residents’ trust in neighbors Results vary across neighborhoods -- from 68.7% in Allston-Brighton to 88.7% in Roslindale in 2001
ICON - Indicator 1.2.2 Civic engagement and social and racial trust, Boston compared to other cities Bostonians lack social and racial trust and civic engagement but rank high in diverse friendships and political engagement
ICON - Indicator 1.2.3 Volunteer activity in Boston Volunteerism has risen steadily from 1992 to 2002

ICON- Goal 1.3 Representative Leadership ICON - Indicator 1.3.1 Leadership of Metro Boston’s top 100 companies, by race and gender Metro Boston’s corporate boards and management continue to be overwhelmingly male and white
  ICON - Indicator 1.3.2 Diversity of elected leadership, Massachusetts Legislature and the Boston City Council, by race and gender More candidates of color and women are running and winning, but are still vastly underrepresented

ICON- Goal 1.4 High Rates of Voter Participation ICON - Indicator 1.4.1  Registered voters and participation rates, Boston, 2000 – 2002 Voter participation increased, rising dramatically in communities of color
  ICON - Indicator 1.4.2 Number of contested elections in Massachusetts Contested elections in Massachusetts have declined from about 75% in 1990 to about 35% in 2002

ICON- Goal 1.5 Healthy Race and Community Relations ICON - Indicator 1.5.1 Reported hate crimes by type, Boston, 1992 – 2001 Hate crimes declined overall, but rose against gays, lesbians, Muslims and Middle Easterners
  ICON - Indicator 1.5.2 Degree of residential segregation in Boston and Metro Boston, 2000 Racial segregation declined somewhat in Boston, but increased for suburban blacks and Latinos

ICON- Goal 1.6 Stability and Investment in Neighborhoods ICON - Indicator 1.6.1 People living at the same address by number of years and by neighborhood Residential stability is stronger in Boston’s less affluent neighborhoods
  ICON - Indicator 1.6.2 Small business loans by neighborhood Small business loans to women and minority- owned business are increasing in Boston

ICON- Goal 1.7 A Welcoming and Inclusive Environment ICON - Indicator 1.7.1 Public buildings and public amenities accessible to people with disabilities By 2000, 90% of all municipal meetings in Massachusetts were accessible to people with disabilities
  ICON - Indicator 1.7.2 Multi-lingual capacity in major public institutions in Boston Interpreters for 30+ languages are available at human service agencies, while City Hall’s volunteer interpreter pool covers 24 languages

ICON- Goal 1.8 Access to Information ICON - Indicator 1.8.1 Library books in circulation, by Boston neighborhood Boston’s branch libraries are generally expanding their circulation, with a few exceptions
  ICON - Indicator 1.8.2 Community newspapers by neighborhood and linguistic group A wealth of local newspapers and media cater to Boston’s neighborhoods and to new linguistic and cultural groups

ICON- Goal 1.9 Strength of the Non-profit Sector ICON - Indicator 1.9.1 Non-profits by budget and type in Boston Boston contains about 2,500 active non-profits; 27% of Boston residents work in the non-profit sector
  ICON - Indicator 1.9.2 Revenues for Boston’s 20 largest non-profit organizations, 2000 - 2002 Revenues have declined for most large non-profits since 2000— a bell weather for other non-profits

ICON- Goal 1.10 Public Support and Philanthropy ICON - Indicator 1.10.1 In- and out-of-state grants in Metro Boston Grants from out-of-state foundations outstripped funding from Massachusetts-based foundations
  ICON - Indicator 1.10.2 Public support, all sources, Massachusetts compared to all states Massachusetts ranks first in all sources of public support for non-profits
  ICON - Indicator 1.10.3 Assets and grants, Massachusetts' top 50 foundations, 1998 and 2000 The assets and grants by Massachusetts' largest foundations rose significantly from 1998 to 2000

 
 
Click for Printer Friendly Version of THIS PAGE
   
   


Send Feedback on the Project


©2003 The Boston Foundation